No survey on "human genes"
28 January 2004
The Bioethics Council has not conducted any surveys on use of human genes
in other organisms, Council Chair Sir Paul Reeves said today.
Responding to a New Zealand Herald story which claimed the Council had
undertaken a "survey" which found a "majority" opposed to "human gene
experiments", Sir Paul said the research was actually a series of focus
group designed to help the Council understand what questions and concerns
New Zealanders had about biotechnology. It was conducted to help the Council
identify the issues that needed to be discussed through the national dialogue,
which will occur over the next three months.
"In research, a survey involves a poll - asking a specific question,
recording how many agree or disagree and coming up with a percentage which
has some statistical validity. We decided very early on not to undertake
that kind of polling because it doesn't ask people to think below the
surface about what are really complex and difficult issues," said Sir
Paul.
"We are charged with helping New Zealanders explore and understand the
cultural, ethical and spiritual aspects of biotechnology and ensuring
that the use of biotechnology has regard for New Zealanders' values.
"This will involve getting New Zealanders talking to each other and thinking
deeply about some pretty fundamental questions, including what it means
to be human. We have planned a dialogue process - which we will launch
next month - to help New Zealanders have that discussion in a constructive
way, which will hopefully help people hear others views as well as examining
their own views and sharing these with the Council.
"We aim to give all New Zealanders who are interested the opportunity
to take part, as well as ensuring that those who have a more direct interest
in biotechnology are fully involved."
"We are asking people to think about whether, when, how and for what
purposes it is acceptable to transfer genes found in humans into organisms
where they do not naturally occur. We are trying to foster a much more
open debate about the issues - to get New Zealanders talking to each other
as well as talking to the Council - rather than getting the 'right' answers
to specific questions."
Sir Paul said the dialogue - which will begin mid-February - would include
facilitated workshops and hui; providing background information and resources
to assist dialogue; online discussion and a more traditional submission
process.
The main outcome of the dialogue will be advice to the Government on
the cultural, ethical and spiritual issues surrounding the use of human
genes in other organisms. Toi te Taiao: the Bioethics Council reports
to the Government through the Minister for the Environment, but has a
high degree of independence, including setting its own work programme
and priorities.
"While the report to Government can be seen as the main outcome, it's
also important to note that the dialogue is an aim in itself," said Sir
Paul. "It's critically important that New Zealanders think about and are
able to constructively discuss and debate the ethical issues that arise
from the development and use of biotechnologies. We are here to help New
Zealand have that debate.
"Biotechnologies are developing very quickly and typically involve complex
science, but they also potentially have huge impacts on people's lives
and we can't afford to leave the debate solely to the experts.
"Our job is to provide the information and the forum for ordinary New
Zealanders to think about and discuss these issues and to make sure that
government takes New Zealanders' views into account when it makes decisions
about how these technologies are regulated.
"We have no illusions about how difficult this is likely to be, but just
because issues are complex and difficult to discuss doesn't mean we should
shy away from them.
"New developments in biotechnology have the ability to bring huge benefits,
but may also pose significant risks and frequently challenge the way in
which we think about our humanity and values. These are 'big issues' and
its crucial that we discuss them as a nation. Toi te Taiao: the Bioethics
Council exists to help that happen."
About the Council
The Government established Toi te Taiao: the Bioethics Council in December
2002 following a recommendation by the Royal Commission on Genetic Modification,
to meet public concern that decision-making was not adequately addressing
the cultural, ethical and spiritual dimensions of genetic modification
and biotechnology.
The purpose of the Council is to:
- Enhance New Zealand's understanding of the cultural, ethical and
spiritual aspects of biotechnology.
- Ensure that the use of biotechnology has regard for New Zealanders'
values.
It does this by providing independent advice to Government on the cultural,
ethical and spiritual aspects of biotechnology and promoting and participating
in public dialogue on these aspects, and enabling public participation
in the Council's activities.
The Council's advice is made public and can reflect diverse views - it
is not required to provide advice based on a consensus of opinion.
|